User talk:WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer




 * Talk Archive

template
I just made pages Uberhot and Milla Jovovich she and other uberhotties need a banner Template:

Uberhottie :

"name" is an Uberhottie and you are not. You may gaze upon her, but may not touch unless Stephen has Nailed her.

Or something like that...

--PhantomDuck 10:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Obamanomics
Hmmm... Ok to nail her... make fun of her ass

you guys afraid of obamarama too? --PhantomDuck 06:38, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Glad ya liked that one, new here, I'll cook up some content tonight!--PhantomDuck 02:34, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

where is a list of those cool banners, like

--PhantomDuck 10:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks... do those need to be created by admins only? if so, I just made pages Uberhot and Milla Jovovich she and other uberhotties need a banner  :

"name" is an Uberhottie and you are not. You may only gaze upon her after Stepen has Nailed her.

Or something like that..

confused??? found the list, how do I make one??? --PhantomDuck 10:48, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Colberto Ertgo Sum
I'd like to do a rewrite of this, starting with spelling it correctly - it should be under "Colberto Ergo Sum" - I Colbert therefore I am. (Implying that Colbert is a verb, which has interesting implications all on its own.) If you want it to be "I watch Colbert, therefore I am" it should be Vigilo Colberto Ergo Sum. Suggestions? --Atenea del Sol 01:06, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * "Colberto Ergo Sum" is only correct to say "I Colbert Therefore I Am." If you're trying to say "I Watch Colbert, Therefore I Am" it should be "Vigilo Colberto Ergo Sum."


 * I personally think it would be interesting to have two different pages for the two concepts - one for Colberto Ergo Sum (although we MUST correct the spelling, it's not ERTGO) and another for Vigilo Colberto Ergo Sum. They're linked parts of the same philosophy.


 * OK, we now have content on Colberto Ergo Sum and Vigilo Colberto Ergo Sum. I'm working on a more overarching Philosophy of Truthiness, because it has come to my attention that we don't have one, and my gut wants to make one. --Atenea del Sol 19:46, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

PonziPro Pocket Fisherman
You got to it before I could! I was just on my way to mark that an ad... --Atenea del Sol 05:53, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh, and where might I find the file of Our Glorious Stephen that's used as the Wikiality logo (ie Stephen over the puzzle bits). I had an idea for the 09 Truthies design, and it's integral. --Atenea del Sol 05:56, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Eco-Friendly
It looks OK to me... Why? Did you notice something? --Atenea del Sol 02:12, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh, and PS - New Template for the userboxes.

Upload
[]

[]

>:(

Real Jew News


I want to find RealJewNews man so he can thank me for the Colbert bump but I don't know how to contact him. His doesn't answer his yahoo emails apparently. >:(

Resist the New World Order!!!
wAQv_w1yH_A&

Thanks
for the nice comment on the KWSR page and the tips on my talk tube.

Proof that Atheists are Sodomites!
Romans 18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness....

26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

Ugh
I love this site, but I'm just bored right now. --An End To Bears 03:32, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Jesus wore pants!
ta9LSx8-9Vc

Take the Oath of Truthiness
-Anyone else who you get to sign it.

I made a list in the talk section of The Oath of Truthiness of who has taken it!

Ponzibilities
Actually, that's what PonziState was meant to be. I just haven't got around to it yet, since the f#(@&*^%@# cable company cut off my internets. I'm back now, though; I'll give it a go soonly. --Atenea del Sol 22:18, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

New Colbert honor
UW-La Crosse Names Eagle Mascot 'Colbert' --Sneakers 11:46, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Honorabilityness being featured on Dr. Colbert's Birthday
IT IS SO HONORABILITYABLE (that's the verbal use of Honorabilityness) THAT IT SHALL BE FEATURED IN DR. COLBERTS BIRTHDAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--dan.carriero@yahoo.com 23:02, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Ponzi Motors
What do you think now? I'm tempted to just link their slogan to the tube on Enron Accounting Practices or to the main Ponzi Scheme article - it would be belabouring the point to spell it all out again... Also, does it need more Stephen, or can I leave it as it is and we'll assume that Stephen has at one point or another in his life owned a Ponziac? --Atenea del Sol 17:56, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry about the lack of "the funny" - I've been kind of depressed by the elections down here lately. I will return my schnozz to the funnystone, as the oldsters say. --Atenea del Sol 19:20, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Hopefully it's now at least partially rectified. I can't tell anymore. --Atenea del Sol 00:32, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Holocaust page
You do know holocaust deniers are jailed in Europe right?

We might want to edit it if holocaust denial laws come to pass. No telling how much them damn Joos are planning to persecute Men of God! <:o

Still here
Just wanted to inform you I have not abandoned Colbert's holiest of wikis, I was just busy. I will be busy fixing minor errors, archiving talk pages, and making new redirects. Nice swine flu article! Small chicken combo from C1456 (Ta↔Tr)  at 20:30, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

First day
Please unlock --GlennBecksATool 15:08, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

well gosh darn gee golly... not even a hello?--GlennBecksATool 09:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm gonna try out that Ameroscopes concept and if you got something to add or change or hate the idea feel free to say so. --GlennBecksATool 09:29, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

New Here
I'm assuming your an admin, and I've been playing in one your ponds. Please take a swing by the Simpsons page and tell me what you think of the edits. The Egoist 19:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I've been a bit active today, as I imagine you've noticed. Just making sure I haven't stepped on any toes.
 * You're doing fine! Just stay truthy!--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 00:15, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey man, the Doctor thinks it, I say it. The Egoist 00:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Satire: Bill O'Reilly or the Whole World
Okay, serious fundamental question; who are we satirizing here? Cause Colbert aims at Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Michael Medved, Dennis Prager, Michael Savage, et al. None of them are virulently anti-semitic. None. In fact, three are Jews.

So I understand satire. I've done satire. I'm a good writer and I think I understand character development and working in an ongoing continuity.

But the trick is, to make sure you don't go too broad, too over-the-top, or you miss your mark. The trick is to stay in character.

So are we trying to stay in character for Colbert here, or not? Are we satirizing the people he satirizes, in the way he satirizes them or do we have broader targets and a wider brush. Because one is totally different from the other.

That's a serious concern for me.

I give not two shits whether anyone thinks Jews killed Jesus, but nowhere has Stephen Colbert made that point as forcefully as anyone on that page. And I kept the idea, in the way I thought he'd express it. If that's wrong, well, I need to know. Because if this isn't an exercise in technical skill (how well can I mimic a well known comic and his widely publicized material) but instead just an exercise in the randomly broad satire, then it's not really the same. Is it?

What rules are we playing the game by?

I've written racist characters and bigots and jingoists of all stripes. It's easy. But what are the rules?The Egoist 04:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Good question. We try to satirize everything.  As far as who we're most like?  I'm going to have to say that we're more like the people who would listen to Bill O'Reilly, et al., a person who get their information from a source where reading is not involved: TV and talk radio.  The next generation's O'Reilly, a Papa Bear2.0, if you will.
 * Certainly we want to be as close to Stephen as possible, but we can't simply transcribe everything he says--that would be copyright infringement and he's made his feelings clear on that, well, maybe Viacom has made his feelings clear for him!
 * You know that since he hasn't covered every topic, we have to take an educated guess as to what he would say, which is where the satire/mocking comes from.
 * As far as the Jew page in general and the Christ-killing in particular, maybe if it was written in the character of an imaginary love-child of two high-status megalomaniacs like Stephen and Mel Gibson?
 * Please note, your caution on this page is appreciated, I don't want the page to turn into Stormfront, nor do I want the fact that Gibson is an unapologetic bigot to disappear from that page. After all, he's not the only ignorant person out there.  I want his ignorance mocked mercilessly.
 * Maybe what can be done is create a "controversy" section where the "guilt" or "innocence" of Jews in the death of everyone's savior is examined? Or, maybe a sharply composed "explanation" for why people believe Jews killed Christ that sounds similar to one of those "Elvis is still alive" true believers screeds.  Or, the section could be one politely-worded circular argument that wraps back onto itself several times?
 * We'll figure it out.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 04:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Try it now; Second Paragraph, Opening.


 * I generally prefer not to revert. Give me another quick crack and we can hammer out some compromise language. --The Egoist 05:38, 30 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I think that's pretty solid. Not too Stormfront for Stephen, not so forgiving.  We can keep tinkering some other time, but I'm down for tonight.The Egoist 05:50, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Try Jew now. With the new and expanded Christ Killing section.The Egoist 15:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * More Revisions to Jew. Re-introducing the more hardline anti-semite stuff so that that it's funny and thought threw. The reason I ditched so much in those broad deletes was that, I'm sorry to say most f the ::::::writing was bad and alot of it was just lists.  I'm trying to re-assemble it into, well, a coherent article.  Take a look when you get the chance..The Egoist 16:22, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Lists are not necessarily bad; they can be a way for beginners to add their own joke to a page without knowing too much about code. However, when they dominate a page, there are several ways to solve the problem: remove the lists altogether, convert the lists to sentences, add non-list content to the page.
 * The Jew page is looking better, especially with the separate Christ-killing section.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 18:31, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Just a thankyou note
Just a thankyou for the cleaning up the tube's I've added some truthiness to. The "Tanksgiving" I should metion I was half- asleep when doing it, the true author of tanksgiving is a TV show in Australia (http://ten.com.au/good-news-week.htm) whatever a podcast is you can download to see.Milkman Bruce 14:31, 6 June 2009 (UTC)