User talk:Chief Reefer

Nice touch on Deity.

--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 22:42, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

I trust you
I know you would never do anything to hurt The Baby Jesus. As for the monitor, we have a "Fry's" out here and they always have stuff on sale (read:cheap). They also sell stuff through outpost.com--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 23:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Yea we recently got fry's. I usually buy pc parts through newegg.com, though i may use a gift certificate i already posses to offset the cost and go to BrandsMart Usa, not sure if they infiltrated the west coast yet, but there stores are painted as giant american flags so they are either the shit or huuuuge liars.--Chief Reefer 23:29, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not encourage Vanity
Chief, pleae do not encourage the new kids to post crap about themselves. You understand real truthiness, so you just keep working on your pages. They can learn truthiness by what you do and post. I will be the bad guy (as an admin) and I will post reminders for them on their pages until they can learn the real truthiness.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 21:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I wasn't tyring to encourage bad things Maurice Clarett is a public figure not the actual user im sorry  i'll leave them alone.--Chief Reefer 21:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I know, but wikiality's definition of vanity (cough) is when something is not about Dr. Stephen T. Colbert, D.F.A. (*wink*) it's supposed to be a funny way of keeping people focused on truthiness and all the things you wrote about in the quantum truthiness pages. And I know you  aren't doing anything wrong, but some of the posters are kids.  And when they see you (a trusted poster in good standing) adding to their pages, they will take that to mean it's okay.  There are so many other things to write about besides just the one guy they are obsessed with.  Look what you did with the quantum truthiness pages! They can figure something else out. --WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 22:12, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I understand sorry to be bubblegum in your last two hairs. --Chief Reefer 22:26, 22 November 2006 (UTC)


 * D'oh! It's okay, you're not doing anything immoral (anti-truthy) I just don't want to encourage people to come on and post any random thing the voices in their heads tell them to.  Otherwise we become Wikipedia, but every page says "Stephen Colbert" on it just to claim it has something to do with Stephen Colbert.
 * You have proven yourself a trusted poster by the pages you created. When I come on and see your name next to a post, I know I don't have to pick through it to make sure it's okay; I can trust that it already is. I may click it anyway to read your new jokes, but you understand truthiness, and sadly, there are still people out there who don't...and those are the ones who need just a little nugde in the right direction.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 22:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

My Monitor made crackling noises near the power supply and flickered and is now dead i posted last few from a different pc in the apt. I think Jesus may have smote it. I guess i know what i need for christmas! --Chief Reefer 23:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC)


 * lolol If I could send you one, I would (I have a spare 19" flat screen)...Fuzzy has an idea about how to fix those "Maurice" pages. --WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 23:07, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

lmao, yea i'm hoping i can get a nice 19inch, but i will probably have to cheap out.

As to "Maurice" im not particularly attatched to the article i jsut saw it as an interesting challenge to weave it into the truthiverse. also i wanted to give that person ideas how to incorporate things. But if fuzzy has a resurreceting notion i will help if i feel i can--Chief Reefer 23:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Lewis Carroll
I have done a little playing around on it, check it out and tell me what you feel...--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 17:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes! I had fun laying out a plot but i sure as heck weren't looking forward to pasting it all together. and the name spelling man i need to read things more closely. The reference to Bletchley Park is awesome. Lil more and it should be ready for a featured nomination.--Chief Reefer 22:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC)


 * This is what I mean by vanity. If someone else had added this page and put something like Lewis Carroll hated bears just like Stephen, then it would have gotten tagged.  But when someone understands truthiness, like you do, the page comes ALIVE !  I knew exactly where you were going with it, and it worked, just a few minor adjustments here and there.  But, if you look carefully, the name of the park isn't Bletchley, it's Belchley (my little ref to Homer Simpson).--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 23:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

OH no i saw it when u first did it and got it immediately, part of mine labeling it awesome(which it is) i infact had to google the correct spelling of the place. (Google should run our public schools.) When Stephen mentioned his name on the show i couldn't pass up the chance to write about him. (I took it as a sign form [God], like Belushi in BLues Brothers) BTW i think the shark page that ended up off shooting it has some real potential.--Chief Reefer 23:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Typing
Which page?--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 03:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

all of the things u edited on QTR


 * Don't worry about it, we don't judge based on grammar and stuff, plus I don't think you're supposed to be changing the pages anyways...I think they're fine; just don't change anything else--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 03:41, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Aye --Chief Reefer 03:43, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Should i revert my changes since D-day to anything that links into QTR?

QTR
Could you write the Quantum Truthic Radiation formula and add it to the page, I feel that is all that is missing from that page.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 04:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The only other thing missing is Truthiverse, otherwise it looks very complete...--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 04:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Looks very nice, whenever you are ready, you can nominate it yourself, or allow me the honor--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 07:06, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Obviously i will always want to change stuff but i wann reformat these last forumulas jsut right and i will let u do it.--Chief Reefer 07:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you, nominations close in about 24 hours, so if you want to take a break for a while, I'll understand...--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 07:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Well ithink its pretty much done if u have to lock it to nominate it then maybe let it sit till i wake up for proof reading and such. plus there was one more fundamental law i can't remember. in any case if u want u can nominate it now and lock it befor edeadline tomorrow i'm not gonna change anything else unless its spelling or a typo or such.
 * We can wait at least 12 hours! Get some sleep and don't worry about it for a while...--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 07:33, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

I think i've filled in all the holes. gotta work for the rest of the deadline so no writing nominate away.--Chief Reefer 17:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Again many many thanks to you my friend, as u already know u have my vote for mod of the year.--Chief Reefer 05:00, 18 November 2006 (UTC)


 * It is a very well-written series, and not just the math-geeks will get to see why--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 05:03, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Truth Cycle
Your truth cycle sounds like it could use a connection to Attitude (something I wrote long ago...)--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 19:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, Yes it Does!--Chief Reefer 19:16, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

I think Attitude is human perception of Quantum Truthic Radiation. The proper Attitude is a result of a greater concentration of Truthiness in the gut? which would be caused by Super-Truthic quantum truthic structures. If your quantum truthic structures pour truthiness into your gut (where it is felt) for a long period of time it causes a change in the personal and public habits of an individual resulting in theproper dress, language, etc?


 * Hey, you are the master of Quantum Truthiness if your gut tells you that is the definition, then who is to argue with you? Not me; I don't want you slapping me with money, or peeing on my leg! (j/k)--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 19:25, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

I have to ask my self the questions and feel the answers :)

Forget About the Union Article for now
I want to nominate your "Quantum Truthiness" articles, but only if you are finished with them...let me know when, nominations are closed NOV 17, 2006 midnight PST--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 08:56, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Ok i will remove all the UC tags from the main and related pages by midnight tonight. School really been kicking my ass last two weeks, Next week got off for the holiday and if this is finished i shoudl have plenty of time to go nuts on the union. thanks again for all your help --Chief Reefer 17:56, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * School is more important than even "Quantum Truthiness", but the thing that is the least important is the Union of Unconcerned Scientists (FYI, I asked a few people who helped out on Math to help with "Union" too, so don't be surprised if someone else starts editing after the break right alongside you!)--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 18:25, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

You seem like someone who knows about science
I was wondering if you wanted to take a stab at Union of Unconcerned Scientists.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 11:06, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

I'll take a few stabs if i can keep my mind sharp(nursing a hangover), i got some studying to do tonight but later like 9 10 west coast i'll make some improvements. --Chief Reefer 21:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Very cool, thank you.

I know i didn't do anythign yet i been doing tests one last est this week tonight so late night tonight or tomorrow i shoudl be able to pound out some raw forged thruthiness.--Chief Reefer 19:01, 8 November 2006 (UTC)


 * There is no rush, I just have put it off for so long, and when I saw what you have been writing it seemed a perfect fit!--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 19:05, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Gospels
I saw that too, and sent him/her a warning. I left it up to give him/her a chance to delete it him/herself. If you deleted it, thank you, I will add a note on his/her talk page. I didn't wanna be a dick tatel tale or whatever but it was like the 4th time so i figured maybe i let a mod know. thanks.--Chief Reefer 18:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Dictionary
Finally, I got the dictionary "dic" up and working. Thanks for your patience.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 18:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC) sweet i saw there were like several catalougues of words or vocabulary is it all to be unified in our wikictionary?
 * Not sure, it's all we have for now, there are a few on-going technical projects in the tubes, so to speak...--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 19:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Voting for Admins
The laste time we had a "Admin of The Year" vote, Katherine Harris won in a landslide!--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 10:29, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

FYI
Short pages are tagged "stub". That just means they're short.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 18:58, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Aye i had gathered --Chief Reefer 23:12, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

BTW
We are in the middle of a technical issue regarding our dictionary, so don't make a word template, not just yet, okay?--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 04:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Aye cap'in!--Chief Reefer 17:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

I know i'm slow i appreciate you though you are a kick ass mod. mod of mods even, a mods mod. :) --Chief Reefer 10:06, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Ditt Tag
Ditt and Truthiness Deficiency tags amount to about the same thing. I just tried to make different ones is all.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 00:25, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

okok i thought ditt was to be used for pages with evil people like bears, John Kerry, Darth Vader, etc. even if the articles concerning them were well written and from the gut. I gotta start reading more than the bold text on these things lmao. Can any one create tags/categories or is that mods only?--Chief Reefer 03:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Anyone can create tags, but wikiality tries to ptortect them because they can potentially effect many pages.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 03:36, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Yea obviously you wouldn't wanna make them willy nily without thought, but, like with all things, i have many ideas.

Jedi Approved, The Truthiness is Strong with this article, such and such has turned to the dark side of the force.. er..uh..i mean truthiness., on and on and on even ones not invloving starwars. I was seriously considering a Truthiology type one like we discussed before and i may make one to use on the Quantum theory. It still needs lots and lots of work but i wander all over the place. --Chief Reefer 03:40, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * We tried to create a N00b Guide, but nothing beats just wandering around...--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 03:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Just Added "Tea-Time"
...to the "food" template.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 06:05, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

cool deal, get ur chin strap on 20 mins to the Report.--Chief Reefer 06:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm in Cauliflower, the liberals make me wait an hour more...--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 06:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Well Technically i stopped waiting 2 hours ago when it came on here on east coast at 11pm. buti stillg et exceited.

--Chief Reefer 06:14, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * me too, and I try to watch all the reruns! But, I do have a life, I swear...--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 06:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

man the Georgia page sucks ass i need to truthi it up. It doesn't mention the swamps or the pine trees.lmao--Chief Reefer 06:20, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Platypus
Absolutely! You can use any of the pictures, all of them if you want, probably not on one page...we are trying to create a better system for organizing them, to make it easier to look something up, but yes, go ahead...--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 22:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

GIMP
You made the Truthientious Scale using GIMP? I am impressed, that is really well done.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 17:29, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

What do you use for images/othermedia if any?

Also I think the archive needs some more animated pics if i have tim ei will make some funny ones.

WHats the limit on multimedia? can we put flash in the pages? what if i hosted an image my self can i just link to it?
 * Multimedia is allowed, someone added that bit where the bear attacks the lady from Russian TV and someone uploaded Stephen showering from some old TV show...ahem...as far as limit, I don't remember but I am sure the damn thing will warn you if you got too big.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 22:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Election Tags on truthiness pages
One more question: did you want to use those, or were those the closest to what you needed?--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 09:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

I thought the election one was pretty funny for truthiality, but could use a few more for variety maybe one about somthing having so much truth it might hurt? "Caution 'topic' is so truthy it might hurt."

" 'topic' contains twice your $daily value for TRUTH"

i need sleep now thanks --Chief Reefer 09:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC) ha i re read it i get what your saying it would be funnier if it said truthiality is an important part of the 2008 repulican electin strategy. thats the feeling i got from it, but i need sleep bad. thanks again --Chief Reefer 09:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

OH NO!
Truthistance is spelled wrong! (Image:Truthientiousscale.gif)--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 08:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC) - yea i fixed it
 * Um, it still looks wrong...(sorry)--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 08:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

HOws now? --Chief Reefer 08:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * It still looks misspelled in the picture It says Truhistance, no "T" is that intentional?--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 09:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

not intentional it should be right now i thought i fixed it but my versionsed got crossed on my desktop i was reuploading the old one instead of fix. --Chief Reefer 09:04, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, spelling right now, very good image, I feel i understand it better now...the further away from bears, the closer I am to Stephen...--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 09:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

thanks, i thought a visual approach might increase the truthiosity.

i felt i migth expand it later and put examples of a few well known individuals and where they would fall on the scale. --Chief Reefer 09:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC) i also want to do a world map with all that is important to truthiality rather than reality.--Chief Reefer 09:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * other individuals would probably best be represented with a number line or a simple line graph, maybe a head or icon to represent. Although that picture is really nice.  BTW What program do you use for images?--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 09:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

GIMP is the best free ware graphics tool i know of.

if you can get your hands on it use ph0t0sh0p, its what the heroes as the Report use!--Chief Reefer 09:27, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Soledad Obrien
There already is a Soledad O'Brien, sorry. And it's been nominated.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 05:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * ok good then i wondered y it wasn' their you find things pretty fast lmao:
 * I would rather catch it soon as I can, rather than let the person continue to add to it and totally get into it and then find out a day or two later that all their work is for naught. Everything I do, I do for Stephen--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 06:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Truthiness Studies
Wow! I just read what you wrote, and I swear I feel smarter. Can one earn a degree in the field of truthiness? BTW, we have tags for Science (sci) and Philosphy (PhT). Tags are case-sensitive, so be careful when you add them ("preview the page before saving, by pressing the "Show preview" button).--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 20:15, 30 October 2006 (UTC)


 * You know, I remember someone tried to come up with "truthology" at one time. Is what you are writing The Truthology?--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 01:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

i think ology is to sciency an ending. science uses thinking with the brain and facts. truthiness relies on thinking with the gut(feeling) and truthiness not facts i think the word should be different. truthiology would be more intline with truthi but i think the name should be the antithesis of science science --> scio scitare to know the proper category would not be science but scentioverum (to feel truth) somthing crazy like that would be beating those facthuggers at thier own game! but i will prolly think of somthing truthier. maybe truthiatry, thruthionomy, truthimetrics, truthimatics? i think truthimatics has alot of promise. i learned my taruthamatic! less math more truth truthgibra? truthialculus? integrated truth functions? they may all be in our future.

i will need to stew on it for a while. i have plenty of things to add to keep me busy.


 * There is a Math and Astronomy and Physics, I forget what else. I just think feel "ology" is more recognizable, it all. But, you are the Father of Truth Studies in this internets tube.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 03:45, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

He IS smart, perhaps even a Truthenius! Cliftoris


 * Ha! Excellent. A thousand blessings upon your home, sir! Cliftoris

My gut tells me there's a Law of Truthnertia, and you just may be the one to be able to explain it Cliftoris

Bear Religion
in Deity, you said bears:
 * Only bears, being Godless Killing Machines, lack a belief in some deity.

Bears do have a religion, Bearism, the deity is (possibly) Ursa.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 23:38, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Formatting
When you make a list of things, you can use two different symbols, the asterisk "*" or the pound sign "#".

When using the asterisk, it will show up as bullet points, like this:
 * The Bible
 * The Book of the Dead

When you use the pound sign, it will look like this:
 * 1) Necronomicon
 * 2) Republican Handbook

When you use them, you won't have to indent or put page breaks in, it does it for you. Hope this helps, if you need any help, go to Help:Editing or drop me a line. Good work so far, citizen!--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 04:54, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

You can't refer to yourself
This wiki is for our glorious Stephen's edification, not yours. Even if you come up with something, you can't credit yourself in the article (your authorship shows up in the "History" tab, so you do get credit for what you write). Give credit either to Stephen or someone else who it would be funny to credit it to. (Just be careful of being too random, like Uncyclopedia.)

Part of the joke of this site is that all articles are supposed to be spoofs of Wikipedia articles. The articles have the authenticity of "real" online information sites because they look like real articles. Also, if you decide to keep your "name" in there, it wouldn't seem real because no mother would name their kid "Chief Reefer". BTW don't use your real name anywhere.

Where you are going with the physics/truth has not been done here, and what you are writing is a good start, just keep it "real" (truthy).--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 05:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

all right i'll fix the stuff and think of a better name for posting tomorrow.
 * There is very little that needs changing, just minor grammar fixes. BTW I love truthicule that is pure genious.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 05:30, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks much for the encouragement.

I can still have my user page right? I fixed the reference to me in the articles. I will work more on the theory tomorrow.

User Page
Your user page is yours. Barring wikipedophilia no one (not even Stephen) can take it away from you.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 05:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Under Construction
Sorry, one more thing, you can tag the pages you are working on with Under Construction (UC) surrounded by two sets of braces (the squiggly parenthesis, these things "{" and "}"). Check Help:Editing or drop me a line if you have problems.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 05:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Again
I'm getting the hang of the formatting, i should read the instuctions before i go jabbering off about fundamental truth particles and such but i couldn't help myself. Construction tags definately handy.
 * NO WAY! Formatting is easy stuff, what you're writing: the truthiness of the physical universe that's the hard part. A computer can do formatting, but it takes an American to properly document truthiness.  Keep doing your good work citizen! Formatting is for factonistas!  Well, people will help with all that, just don't worry too much about it.  Formatting isn't the most important part of an article, the truthiness is. --WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 06:06, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

U'r Gonna need a donut
Congrats, You made Article 2,420 use it wisely. --Chief Reefer 07:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)